When an organization has determined the most effective mix of communications media, i.e. the means to communicate, it should apply sufficient attention to deciding what to say and when to say it, then design and implement a sufficiently robust testing and continual improvement process.
The communications industry has created an extremely wide variety of means to communicate, but each one has a number of characteristics that should be taken into consideration when planning to communicate in a crisis. In a crisis, the normal selection criteria may not be applicable or those criteria may take different priorities. Simplicity, ease of use, reliability under heavy use and basic effectiveness take on added importance.
Chances are incredibly high that your company is going to experience a crisis of some kind in the next 5 years. It's how you handle that crisis with the media which will likely determine whether that crisis builds or seriously damages your company. That's why it is vital that you develop a crisis communications and management plan that prepares you in advance for this eventuality. In preparing this plan, keep in mind that this crisis may allow you to continue business as normal, or it may result in a situation where you aren't able to get access to the tools you normally use to do your job (natural disaster, lockout, etc.) so your crisis communications kit needs to provide the capability for you to provide the appearance of normality even in the most abnormal situations. Thus it's important for your crisis communications kit to not only be duplicated in some offsite location, but to also include information, disks, graphics, computer files, photos, etc. that are normally readily at your fingertips in your office.
The Ten Steps of Crisis Communications
1. Identify Your Crisis Communications Team
2. Identify Spokespersons
3. Spokesperson Training
4. Establish Communications Protocols
5. Identify and Know Your Audiences
6. Anticipate Crises
7. Assess the Crisis Situation
8. Identify Key Messages
9. Decide on Communications Methods
10. Riding Out the Storm
If a crisis strikes, who will the spokesperson be? What will he or she say? How timely will that response be? Will it be believable? Reassuring? Who has the key to the office after hours?
For organizations, these may well be life or death questions that point up the need for crisis planning and preparedness. Along with a responsive plan comes the requirement that it be drilled regularly, as realistically as possible.
An organization may pride itself on relating to the news media when things are going well. But if events take a dire turn and effective crisis response isn't provided, media relations can quickly sour. In good times or bad, management needs to be ready to communicate well.
The Next step in Crisis Communication is the Crisis Communication planning. This crisis communication plan will outline a generic, basic crisis communication plan. To apply it to your situation you may need to adjust some things and add your own information. It is not intended to answer all questions or fill all needs it is just a basic outline of options you might consider if and when you are in the midst of a crisis and need help.
A crisis is any situation that threatens the integrity or reputation of your company, usually brought on by adverse or negative media attention. These situations can be any kind of legal dispute, theft, accident, fire, flood or manmade disaster that could be attributed to your company. It can also be a situation where in the eyes of the media or general public your company did not react to one of the above situations in the appropriate manner. This definition is not all encompassing but rather is designed to give you an idea for the types of situations where you may need to follow this plan. If handled correctly the damage can be minimized.
In contrast, one of the worst environmental accidents in history, the Exxon Valdez oil spill, is generally regarded as one of the worst managed in history because of the lack of coordination between management, operations and communications. The extraordinary work done by the Exxon oil spill response crews in terrible weather conditions is generally not known because of the company's inept and insensitive communications with the community and government officials. It took CEO Lawrence Rawl two weeks to visit the scene and make any kind of substantive statement regarding the tragedy.
If anybody questions the importance of focusing on the financial consequences in crisis communications, consider what the lack of crisis communications cost Exxon in addition to the damage to its reputation as a leading oil company. The costs of the cleanup were approximately $1 billion, but Exxon was forced by the courts in Alaska to pay an additional $3 billion in compensatory and punitive damages. One can only speculate on how much less the punitive damages would have been if Exxon had expressed any empathy in the first days after the accident to the fishermen, local citizens and millions of TV viewers who were appalled and outraged by the damage done to Prince William Sound.
Another oil company, Texaco, had a major crisis of its own when a disgruntled employee secretly tape-recorded an inflammatory discussion about racial discrimination among several Texaco managers. When the employee gave the tape to the plaintiff's attorneys in a lawsuit alleging racial bias in Texacos personnel practices, they distributed it to the New York Times . The crisis went from Smoldering Level 1 to Sudden Level 4 in a few hours.
To its credit, Texaco responded quickly and decisively, with CEO, Peter Bijur, serving as crisis manager and principal spokesperson in the ensuing media onslaught. Texaco took action to discipline the employees involved, resolve the lawsuits and defuse a boycott called by Reverend Jesse Jackson.
The dispute was resolved for $175 million, and probably cost the company at least that much more in internal costs related to the crisis. However, it could have been far worse for Texaco's reputation and much more damaging financially if it had not been resolved so quickly. In this instance there was no business continuity plan and no time to develop one. This was crisis management and crisis communications at its best-- and it paid off.